„Bioetica, educația și familia”, cu prof. Maria Luisa Di Pietro, la Iași
În Aula Magna a Institutului Teologic Romano-Catolic „Sfântul Iosif” din Iași este programată o interesantă conferință. În prim-plan va fi dr. Maria Luisa Di Pietro, profesor la Universitatea Catolică „Sacro Cuore” din Roma. Ea va susține o conferință cu tema „Bioetica, educația și familia”. Momentul este programat vineri, 22 noiembrie 2019, începând cu ora 16:00. Cu această ocazie va avea loc și prezentarea cărții cu același titlu, publicată recent la Editura Sapientia. Evenimentul este organizat și de Facultatea de Teologie Romano-Catolică.
Master în Științele Căsătoriei și ale Familiei
Prof. Maria Luisa Di Pietro a absolvit, în anul 1982, Facultatea de Medicină și Chirurgie la Universitatea Catolică „Sacro Cuore” din Roma. S-a specializat în Medicina Legală și a Asigurărilor la aceeași facultate (1991). A absolvit și un master în Științele Căsătoriei și ale Familiei. Asta în anul 1987, la Institutul „Ioan Paul al II-lea” pentru studii despre căsătorie și familie, din cadrul Universității Pontificale „Sfântul Ioan din Lateran”. Din 2001, până în prezent, este profesor asociat la Facultatea de Medicină și Chirurgie a Universității Catolice „Sacro Cuore” din Roma. Din 2003 până în 2019 a fost profesor de „Bioetică și familie” la Institutul Pontifical „Ioan Paul al II-lea” pentru studii despre căsătorie și familie din Roma. A publicat numeroase studii de specialitate și cărți. Printre acestea este și „Bioetica, educația și familia”, tradusă în Limba română de dr. Gema Bacoanu și pr. Iosif Agiurgioaei.
Publicație: Bună Ziua Iași
UBB, prima în topul universităţilor din România
Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai (UBB) ocupă primul loc în clasamentul global al universităţilor din România - Metaranking Universitar 2019.
Universitatea din Bucureşti ocupă poziţia a doua, iar locul trei se află Universitatea Politehnică din Capitală. Încă de acum patru ani, UBB continuă să fie pe primul loc, punctajul său crescând anual, de la 13, cât avea în 2016, la 18, în acest an, în condiţiile în care, cel mai mic punctaj din clasament este 1, obţinut de către Universitatea Valahia din Târgovişte, care se află pe locul 12. Clasamentul stabileşte ierarhia universităţilor din ţară combinând performanţele lor individuale din clasamentele academice internaţionale ale universităţilor.
Concret, în acest an, singura modificare privind primele locuri din clasament s-a produs la poziţia a patra, aceasta fiind ocupată de Universitatea de Vest din Timişoara, care a depăşit Universitatea „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iaşi. Apoi, pe locul 5 se află Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Carol Davila din Bucureşti, Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Iuliu Haţieganu din Cluj-Napoca. Poziţia a şasea este ocupată de către Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Grigore T. Popa din Iaşi. Universitatea Tehnică Gheorghe Asachi din Iaşi ocupă locul 7. Universitatea Politehnica Timişoara şi Universitatea Tehnică din Cluj-Napoca s-au clasat pe poziţia a opta. Universitatea Transilvania din Braşov ocupă locul nouă. În final, poziţia a zecea este deţinută de către Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti, Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Victor Babeş din Timişoara şi Universitatea de Ştiinţe Agricole şi Medicină Veterinară din Cluj-Napoca.
Metarankingul Universitar este un demers de clasificare a universităţilor româneşti demarat în anul 2016 de către Ministerul Educaţiei şi Cercetării prin intermediul Grupului de Experţi la Nivel Înalt. Obiectivul Metaranking-ului Universitar din 2019 a fost să identifice care dintre cele 54 de universităţi publice şi 37 de universităţi private acreditate au o minimă vizibilitate internaţională în rankingurile majore ale universităţilor, fiind prezente în cel puţin un ranking inclus în analiză şi care este impactul lor relativ în aria academică internaţională.
Publicație: Adevărul
Problemele universităţilor române: cămine-dezastru şi politizarea funcţiilor de conducere
Universităţi care nu au adoptat un cod universitar al drepturilor şi obligaţiilor studentului, lipsa locurilor de cazare în cămine, politizarea instituţiilor academice şi carenţe serioase în facilitarea integrării studenţilor cu dizabilităţi – acestea sunt doar câteva dintre problemele care persistă în mediului universitar, conform unui raport al Alianţei Naţionale a Organizaţiilor Studenţeşti din România.
Lipsa unor coduri universitare publice ale drepturilor şi obligaţiilor studentului în aproximativ un sfert din universităţile de stat din România e o problemă cu implicaţii majore pentru viaţa studenţilor, având în vedere importanţa unui astfel de act pentru interacţiunea de pe picior de egalitate a acestora cu autorităţile academice. Mai mult, adoptarea şi publicarea pe site-ul universităţilor a unui astfel de document este o obligaţie legală în urma unui ordin de ministru din 2012. Dar nici în situaţiile în care există acest act, drepturile şi obligaţiile studenţilor nu sunt specificate într-un mod substantiv şi complet. „În majoritatea cazurilor, este o simplă transcrierea, excluzând implementarea propriu-zisă a prevederilor, iar o majoritate covârşitoare nu este în conformitate cu prevederile de la nivel naţional. Doar 5,4% dintre drepturile prevăzute de actul normativ naţional se găsesc în documentele interne ale tuturor universităţilor analizate”, arată raportul citat.
Lipsa locurilor de cazare în cămine studenţeşti, precum şi condiţiile cel puţin problematice din multe clădiri destinate locuirii, nu ar trebui să vină ca o surpriză, România având o tristă tradiţie în această privinţă. În anul universitar 2018-2019, doar o treime din universităţi au reuşit să acopere complet cererile de cazare. Pe lângă problema locuirii, un procent semnificativ de studenţi care au participat la realizarea raportului au observat o lipsă semnificativă a măsurilor prin care universităţile ar putea facilita integrarea studenţilor cu dizabilităţi, mai ales atunci când vine vorba de existenţa resurselor necesare pentru aceştia în urmarea fără piedici arbitrare a educaţiei superioare.
Politizarea învăţământului superior este o altă problemă ridicată de raportul ANOSR. Mai exact, 30,4 % dintre studenţi care au răspuns chestionarului au susţinut că în mediul universitar în care îşi desfăşoară activitate există persoane care au candidat sau vor candida pentru funcţii publice, 26,1% dintre ei susţinând şi că aceste persoane deţin funcţii de conducere în universităţi. În forma iniţială a legii educaţiei, era prevăzută incompatibilitatea dintre funcţia de rector şi cea de parlamentar, dar Ecaterina Andronescu a eliminat această prevedere în 2012, precum şi pe cea care viza incompatibilitatea dintre funcţia de rector şi cea de lider de partid.
Publicație: Adevărul
Union warns of further strikes in universities row
Staff due to walk out next week and there could be further action next term
University students in the UK are facing disruption to their studies in the last few weeks of term and into the new year after union leaders warned of a second wave of strike action if staff demands are not met.
More than 40,000 university staff at 60 universities are preparing to go on strike for eight days from next Monday, followed by a period of work to rule, in protest over their pensions, pay and conditions.
But with no progress in negotiations, the University and College Union (UCU) warned of further strike action next term in order to pursue their claims and bring their employers back to the table.
More than a million students face disruption over the next two weeks, with lectures and tutorials cancelled and no plans to reschedule lost teaching time. The National Union of Students has called on its members to support lecturers and many are expected to join them in the protests.
About 43,600 university lecturers, librarians, technicians and other academic staff are taking action in two separate disputes – one about changes to the Universities Superannuation Scheme, which triggered strike action last year, and the other about pay and conditions.
The UCU general secretary, Jo Grady, said she was disappointed there had been no substantive talks over pay and conditions. Negotiators held a final meeting about the pensions dispute on Wednesday with little hope of a breakthrough.
“The employers seem to want to test the mettle of staff and see if they will turn up on picket lines,” Grady said. “It is really unfortunate they have decided to do that because they are misjudging their staff.
“More and more people are joining the union and there is a real feeling of anger. There could be a second wave of strikes if we don’t get a long-term, sustainable offer and universities refuse to take our concerns seriously.”
The universities affected include many of the biggest and most prestigious institutions in the UK, including Oxford, Manchester, University College London, Durham, Leeds, Liverpool, Bristol, Birmingham, Cardiff, Edinburgh and Cambridge.
The action comes less than two years after 65 universities were brought to a virtual standstill by 14 days of strikes over changes to staff pensions, in an unprecedented wave of industrial action in the UK higher education sector.
Last year the union succeeded in forcing employers to drop plans to change pensions from defined benefit schemes to the less favourable defined contribution schemes. It is now challenging the size of staff contributions, which it thinks should be capped at 8% of a lecturer’s salary, rather than the 9.6% approved by employers.
The UCU estimates the pension changes will leave lecturers around £240,000 worse off in retirement, and professors up to £730,000 worse off. On pay, the union said there had been a 17% real-terms drop since 2009 and there was concern about pay inequality for women and BME staff. The UCU also wants employers to address concerns about growing casualisation of the higher education workforce.
Although most students supported their lecturers in last year’s industrial action, some successfully claimed compensation for lost teaching time. Similar action seems likely this year, with a petition already under way at Bangor University calling for reimbursements of £380 per student.
Universities UK (UUK) and the University and Colleges Employers Association wrote an open letter to staff this week challenging the UCU. The UUK president, Julia Buckingham, said: “In recent months, employers have taken significant steps to protect the value of both pensions and pay because we care about our dedicated and talented staff.”
Publicație: The Guardian
Oxford Union president steps down in wake of blind student row
Postgraduate who was dragged from event says union should do more to clear his name
The president of the Oxford Union has bowed to pressure to resign after a blind student was dragged by his ankles from a debate event by a security guard.
Ebenezer Azamati, a postgraduate student from Ghana, has demanded that the union do more to clear his name of any implication of wrongdoing after he was forcibly removed from the event last month when he tried to return to his seat before the debate.
Brendan McGrath, the president of the union, who alleged that Azamati had behaved violently, accepted he “manifestly failed” in his duty to ensure every member felt welcome.
In a resignation statement posted on the union’s Facebook account, McGrath apologised and said he was wrong to seen to be trying to blame Azamati in the aftermath of incident.
Azamati said he was still dismayed by the union’s continued failure to acknowledge he did nothing wrong. He also criticised the union for incorrectly suggesting he was involved in a promised review of its procedures.
In a statement issued through Bindmans, the lawyers representing Azamati, he said: “Mr McGrath and the union have yet to acknowledge that I have done nothing wrong, which is upsetting. I would like the union to state now, clearly and straightforwardly, that I am not at fault in any way for the way I was treated.”
McGrath’s resignation came after the Oxford University Africa Society (AfriSoc) launched a petition calling for him to to go and union members started impeachment procedures against him. AfriSoc said Azamati’s treatment was “violent, unjust, inhumane and shameful”.
Several other senior post holders at the union have already resigned over the incident, according to Cherwell, the university’s student magazine.
McGrath said he was advised to bring a disciplinary case against Azamati on behalf of the security guard involved but failed to recognise the wider “institutional problems” highlighted by the incident.
“For all of my shortcomings, and all of my mistakes, I apologise profusely and unqualifiedly,” he added.
President of the Oxford Union, a debating society that operates independently of the university, is one of the most sought-after positions at Oxford and frequently a springboard to high-profile political careers. Past presidents include Boris Johnson, Benazir Bhutto, Michael Foot, Tony Benn and Jeremy Thorpe.
We share the widespread outrage regarding the unacceptable treatment of Ebenezer Azamati, a member of our University community, at the Oxford Union. Ebenezer’s college and the University are working to fully support him.
In his resignation statement, McGrath also called for an independent review of the union’s policies on disability and a professional review of its security system and staff training.
Azamati, an international relations student, demanded more details on the review McGrath had announced. He said: “It is unclear whether, and if so how, race and other equality issues are to be grappled with.”
He added: “The union has also stated that there are ongoing discussions with me about putting matters right. That is not correct.
Azamati said the union “should explain what it proposes to do and then to listen to what I have to say about its proposals. These steps would make Mr McGrath’s statement and resignation far more meaningful than it currently is.”
He expressed gratitude to those who had offered him support since the incident.
Azamati successfully appealed on Saturday against what he said were claims of “false violent disorder” by the union. The union withdrew its charge of violent misconduct against him and apologised “unreservedly”.
The society has hosted speakers and debates since 1823.
Publicație: The Guardian și The Independent
University strikes: Students could see exams disrupted amid second wave of action in 2020
More than 43,000 staff members set to walk out from Monday, as union warns action may last into January
Students could face a second wave of strikes in the new year causing disruption to exams if a dispute over pensions, pay and working conditions is not resolved, the University and College Union has warned.
More than 43,000 members of university staff will walk out at 60 institutions across the UK next week and more than 1 million students are set to be affected by the eight days of strike action.
Jo Grady, general secretary of the University and College Union (UCU), has issued warnings that strikes could continue after Christmas, which may affect
Speaking ahead of the strikes, which start on Monday, Ms Grady said: “There could be a second wave if we don’t get a sustainable, long-term and fair offer from employers.”
She added that fresh walkouts in the spring term could cause similar disruption to last year - when a bitter dispute over pensions saw hundreds of external examiners resign amid the unprecedented action.
“In universities now they will be gearing up for the final few weeks of term for students to either submit essays or to run revision sessions with them for the timetable period that will kick in mid-January onwards,” Ms Grady said.
Union members will also launch other forms of industrial action when they return to work after the eight strike days - including working strictly to contract and refusing to reschedule lectures lost to strike action.
The UCU leader claimed that some staff had been threatened with “draconian” 100-per-cent pay deductions for action short of a strike by HR departments at universities.
Last year, universities were brought to a standstill by unprecedented strikes over pensions and some institutions were forced to pay compensation to students over lost teaching hours.
Students, who have to pay up to £9,250 a year in tuition fees, have already begun demanding refunds the strikes set to take place next week.
Ms Grady said: “Universities will save hundreds of thousands through strike pay deductions of their staff. Students need to be worried and concerned and asking questions about where that money goes.
“I would prefer if students did not have to think of themselves as a consumer in this situation,” she added.
The UCU’s higher education committee is yet to decide whether it will extend the strike action, which is currently planned for 25 November until 4 December, into the new year.
Pension reforms mean university staff will pay about £40,000 more into their pension but receive nearly £200,000 less in retirement, the UCU says.
Increased contributions and other changes to the universities superannuation scheme (USS) mean that many people are suffering substantial losses, the union has previously warned.
Last month, UCU members backed strike action in two separate disputes, one on pensions and one on pay and working conditions.
Overall, 79 per cent of UCU members who voted backed strike action in the ballot over changes to pensions. In the ballot on pay, equality, casualisation and workloads, 74 per cent of members backed strike action.
A spokesperson for USS employers said: "Employers are committed to ensuring USS remains one of the very best pension schemes in the country and we want to work closely with UCU to consider a longer-term solution to its funding situation.
"Our priority is doing all we can to reduce any impact of this action on students, other staff and the wider community. We hope any further damaging action can be avoided and will continue our discussions.
"We believe we can achieve a joint and fair solution and that none of us wish to see students disrupted."
Publicație: The Independent
Les syndicats étudiants appellent à une mobilisation le 26 novembre
Une intersyndicale réunissant les organisations étudiantes a appelé mercredi à une mobilisation le 26 novembre pour demander «un plan d’urgence».
Une nouvelle mobilisation en perspective. Plusieurs syndicats étudiants ont appelé mercredi à une mobilisation le 26 novembre pour demander «un plan d’urgence» et «une politique structurelle de résorption de la précarité étudiante», deux semaines après l’immolation d’un étudiant à Lyon.
Plusieurs incidents ont éclaté depuis qu’Anas K., un étudiant de 22 ans, s’est immolé par le feu devant le siège du Crous à Lyon, après avoir écrit une lettre évoquant ses difficultés financières et dénonçant la précarité dans laquelle sont plongés nombre d’étudiants.
«Accentuer la pression sur le gouvernement»
«Il nous semble que le gouvernement ne semble pas prendre conscience de la gravité structurelle de la situation qui a amené au drame du 8 novembre», écrivent dans un communiqué commun la Fage, l’Unef, la FSE, Solidaires étudiant.e.s, et l’Alternative.
Ils appellent ainsi, «d’ici le 5 décembre, à accentuer la pression sur le gouvernement afin qu’il mette en œuvre d’une part un plan d’urgence, d’autre part une politique structurelle de résorption de la précarité étudiante, afin que l’Etat assure des conditions matérielles de vie dignes à tout.te.s les étudiante.s», poursuivent-elles.
Publicație: Le Figaro
Etudier la gestion en école ou à l’université : une guerre des mondes à la française
Pour se former à la gestion, un double système cohabite : les écoles de commerce, privées, et les Instituts d’administration des entreprises, publics. Un clivage historique.
Au nord de Caen, entre l’hôpital et le périphérique, ils sont distants de quelques dizaine de mètres. D’un côté du parking, le bâtiment l’Ecole de management Normandie (EM Normandie), parallélépipède blanc percé de vitres, floqué de son logo rouge. De l’autre, celui de l’Institut d’administration des entreprises (IAE), rattaché à l’université.
On imagine que les étudiants de ces deux établissements caennais, tous deux spécialisés dans le management et la gestion des entreprises, se connaissent, participent ensemble à des soirées, des événements… En réalité, pas vraiment.
Les étudiants de l’IAE que nous avons rencontrés, attablés dans leur cafétéria aux murs orange vif, ne fréquentent guère leurs étranges voisins de l’école de commerce, prêts à « dépenser 10 000 euros par an, pour une formation qui est équivalente à celle de l’IAE, à part qu’ils ont peut-être des associations plus développées et davantage de moyens pour tout ce qui est extrascolaire… », résume François, étudiant en master. A cela Mathilde et ses camarades de l’EM Normandie répondent par une indifférence polie. « L’IAE ? On a chacun notre campus, et à part à la médiathèque qu’on partage, on les croise peu… »
Il y a une vingtaine d’années, les directeurs des deux institutions ont tenté d’unir leurs forces, mais le projet a capoté. Une ligne de démarcation entre les deux campus, sur le sol de la bibliothèque, vient rappeler la dualité de l’enseignement de la gestion à la française. D’un côté les écoles de commerce − privées, payantes − et, de l’autre, les IAE, instituts universitaires spécialisés dans les mêmes disciplines.
Un clivage historique
Ce clivage, spécifique à la France, est une histoire ancienne. Daniel Gouadain, ancien directeur d’IAE, le fait remonter à « la dichotomie traditionnelle entre le système universitaire et celui des grandes écoles ». « Après la Révolution, Polytechnique puis l’ENS sont venues remplacer les universités discréditées par l’Ancien Régime. » Quelques années plus tard, alors que la révolution industrielle fait émerger de nouveaux besoins de formation, l’Ecole supérieure de commerce de Paris est créée en 1819, puis les écoles supérieures de commerce (ESC) du Havre (ancêtre de l’EM Normandie), de Marseille, Lyon, Bordeaux… Derrière ces initiatives, qui naissent dans le giron des chambres de commerce, des « industriels issus des milieux libéraux », explique Philippe Maffre, auteur d’une thèse sur les écoles de commerce.
Publicație: Le Monde
« En travaillant pour des marques peu éthiques, j’ai eu l’impression d’être devenue ma propre ennemie »
Flora, qui travaille dans une agence de publicité à Paris, raconte son tiraillement entre ses convictions et son quotidien.
Chaque mois, des jeunes diplômés racontent sur Le Monde Campus leur quête de sens et leur transition professionnelle, en partenariat avec la communauté Paumé·e·s de l’association Makesense. Flora, 30 ans, diplômée d’une école de communication, a rédigé ce texte.
Et toi, tu fais quoi dans la vie ? « Je suis conceptrice rédactrice dans la pub. » Cette phrase, je l’ai prononcée des milliers de fois. Cette phrase, pendant des années, je l’ai prononcée en étant fière d’avoir réussi à trouver un job qui me passionnait, dans lequel je m’épanouissais. Un job qui aurait rendu fière la Flora de 14 ans coincée dans un petit village drômois, qui rêvait d’habiter à Paris et qui avait toujours voulu mener la vie que je mène actuellement.
J’ai obtenu un BTS communication dans un lycée privé, puis un master de chef de projet multimédia à l’Iscom, une école à Paris. J’a réussi mes stages, réussi mon book, réussi à être épanouie en bossant dans un domaine que j’aimais, pourtant très concurrentiel. Je me trouvais dans une agence de pub avec de beaux budgets, cinquante « collaborateurs », comme on dit, qui étaient pour la plupart devenus des amis, dans un quartier cool de Paris. Je jouais au baby-foot entre deux pads thaïs végétariens et trois brainstormings. Cela ne m’a pas empêché, à 30 ans, de réussir autre chose : à être complètement paumée.
Convictions versus réalité
L’aspect créatif de mon boulot était bel et bien là, mais il ne paraissait plus si épanouissant que ça. J’avais beau écrire un film publicitaire créatif, je l’écrivais toujours dans le but de le vendre à des banques, des marques de sodas, des marques de bières… qui ne sont pas du bon côté de la barrière au niveau éthique. Mais je m’étais tellement battue pour en arriver là. J’étais parvenue à réussir aux yeux du monde. Ma mère était fière, ma sœur était fière, mon père ne comprenait pas vraiment ce que je faisais, mais il était fier quand même. Alors je me disais que je n’avais pas la légitimité pour me poser de questions.
J’ai commencé à en parler à des gens qui étaient dans le même domaine que moi :
— Mais ça ne te dérange pas de bosser pour des mecs qui s’enrichissent sur le dos des pauvres ?
— Bah… on n’a pas vraiment le choix, si ?
Bah si. J’ai commencé à chercher des solutions qui me permettraient de continuer de lier la créativité que me permet mon job en l’associant à des fins plus humaines. Pas facile. Faire de la pub pour des associations ? Pas de budget. Pour des start-up avec des vraies valeurs ? Pour des ONG ? Chez l’annonceur ? A chaque fois que j’avais la sensation de toucher une solution du bout des doigts, un article ou une vidéo au titre dénonciateur venait me faire un croche-patte pour me mettre le nez dans la réalité : faire de la pub, c’est bien quand il y a de l’argent. Et les gens qui veulent faire changer les choses, ils n’ont pas d’argent à investir dans la pub.
Réunion après réunion, le greenwashing des présentations, la mauvaise foi des clients, les mensonges que tout le monde connaissait mais que personne ne venait dénoncer me sautaient au visage. Je savais comment ça marchait, je l’avais toujours su. Mais je ne pouvais plus avoir des convictions éthiques chez moi et les ranger dès que j’allais travailler. Je ne pouvais plus être végétarienne depuis huit ans et promouvoir des marques agroalimentaires qui empoisonnaient les gens. Je ne pouvais plus faire attention à mes déchets et écrire des scripts pour des produits suremballés fabriqués à l’autre bout du monde. Je ne pouvais plus être bénévole chaque semaine dans une association qui aide les sans-abris et promouvoir des marques totalement déconnectées de ce monde.
Tous ces « à côté » dont j’étais fière, tout ce qui me constituait en tant qu’humain, en tant que personne investie qui voulait faire des choix pour un monde plus juste, semblaient vains. J’avais la sensation d’être ma propre ennemie, et quand on se bat contre soi-même, mieux vaut avoir une garde solide. Malgré les coups que j’esquivais face à mes propres jugements, je ne m’en sortais pas. A chaque fois que je me regardais dans le miroir de ma salle de bain, je méprisais mon reflet.
Prendre du temps
J’ai pris un congé sans solde et suis allée passer deux mois dans un sanctuaire animalier en Afrique du Sud. Deux mois de volontariat pour faire le point, aider les animaux à leur réhabilitation, et tenter la mienne. En pleine nature, entourée de personnes qui avaient choisi une vie altruiste et minimaliste, mes problèmes me paraissaient bien loin. En revenant de ce voyage, les choses étaient encore plus violentes. Je savais que je devais agir.
Si vous pensez que cette histoire se finit bien, et que le happy end est au bout du paragraphe, vous vous plantez complètement. A défaut d’avoir trouvé une solution, j’ai décidé d’écouter le problème. Je vis toujours entre deux pads thaïs végétariens et trois brainstormings, mais j’ai compris que plutôt que d’essayer de faire taire mes questionnements, je devais les laisser s’exprimer. Que les tiraillements et remises en question font de nous des êtres humains et qu’ils sont là pour nous alerter sur nos envies à suivre, nos chemins à explorer, notre vie à vivre.
Nous sommes nombreux à avoir cette sensation de ne pas faire assez, de ne pas être à notre place, de subir notre quotidien. Il est capital d’en parler et de s’entourer de personnes qui sont dans la même dynamique. J’ai ainsi compris qu’être paumée, ce n’était pas grave, et que l’être à plusieurs pouvait même être très inspirant. On a tellement tendance à vouloir trouver vite et de manière définitive une réponse bien ficelée à chaque « et toi tu fais quoi dans la vie ? » qu’on ne prend plus le temps de s’écouter soi-même. Je crois qu’il faut, à certains moment, se laisser la possibilité de ne pas savoir.
Publicație: Le Monde
|
